Browser monitoring's PageViewTiming
event sends each data point as a separate event as soon as it is available. Because we do not restrict the timing, you can receive first paint or first interaction data regardless of when it fires. This document describes why and how to use PageViewTiming
and its attributes to query data about your site, component loading, and user performance metrics, both from visual and responsiveness standpoints.
Why use PageViewTiming?
If your application uses asynchronous or dynamic pages, you may need additional details about site or component loading. But pages can load content in many different ways, and users control when they interact with that content. This is why some user-centric performance metrics happen outside the standard window onload (page load time) in the browser agent.
For example, users may become impatient and begin clicking as soon as content is on the webpage. Or, they may wait to use the page until long after content is loaded.
The PageViewTiming
event provides a more real-time delivery mechanism that does not have a dependency on any other event. The additional metrics can help you understand how users experience your site, both from visual and responsiveness standpoints.
Support for Google's core web vitals
As of agent version 1177 for browser monitoring, we have full support for core web vitals. This feature is available in all flavors of the agent (Lite, Pro, or Pro+SPA).
Note that the metrics that make up core web vitals evolve over time. The current set focuses on three aspects of the user experience: loading, interactivity, and visual stability. It includes the following metrics and their respective thresholds:
- Largest contentful paint (LCP): measures loading performance. To provide a good user experience, LCP should occur within 2.5 seconds of when the page first starts loading.
- Interaction to next paint (INP): measures latency of all user interactions with a page. To provide a good user experience, pages should have a INP of less than 200 milliseconds.
- Cumulative layout shift (CLS): measures visual stability. To provide a good user experience, pages should maintain a CLS of less than 0.1.
For each of these metrics, to ensure you're hitting the recommended target for most of your users, a good threshold to measure is the 75th percentile of page loads, segmented across mobile and desktop devices.
To learn more, watch our Nerd Days talk on perceived performance.
Detailed visual, interactivity, and responsiveness metrics
The BrowserInteraction
and PageView
events end their reporting when they receive the page window load (or window load and AJAX) timing. However, paint and interactivity metrics can happen at any time. PageViewTiming
delivers these metrics as a separate event to:
- Account for the variability in this timing.
- Avoid setting an arbitrary timeout.
- Prevent holding
BrowserInteraction
andPageView
events indefinitely.
Additional data | Comments |
---|---|
| The Using |
| The Google's research found that looking at when the largest element was rendered was a more accurate way to measure when the main content of a page is loaded and useful. For more information about this metric, including limitations and considerations, see the w3c draft. We also report the cumulative layout shift score attribute with LCP. This attribute is reported as Largest contentful paint is one of three metrics identified by Google as the core web vitals. LCP values up to 2.5 seconds are considered "Good," between 2.5 and 4 seconds are considered "Needs Improvement," and above 4 seconds are considered "Poor." |
| With the addition of The We also report the cumulative layout shift (CLS) score attribute at the moment of the user's first interaction. This attribute is reported as INP is one of three metrics identified by Google as the core web vitals. An INP score of 200 ms or less is considered "Good," between 200-500 ms is considered "Needs Improvement," and above 500 ms is considered "Poor." |
| Cumulative layout shift (CLS) is available with agent v1177 or higher. CLS is an important, user-centric metric for measuring visual stability because it helps quantify how often users experience unexpected layout shifts. A low CLS helps ensure that the page is delightful. Cumulative layout shift is one of three metrics identified by Google as the core web vitals. CLS scores up to 0.1 are considered "Good," between 0.1-0.25 are considered "Needs Improvement," and above 0.25 are considered "Poor." |
| Interaction to next paint (INP) is available with agent v1227 or higher. INP is a newer metric for measuring runtime responsiveness and user-perceived performance. It measures the largest latency between user interactions and page response or repaints. This is an experimental but identified-as-significant metric added in Web Vitals v3. INP scores up to 200 ms are considered "Good," between 200-500 ms are considered "Needs Improvement," and above 500 ms are considered "Poor." |
| You can review different types of activities with the |
| This is the |
| This is the reported size of the |
| Long task reporting is available starting with agent v1227. This event represents per entry observed by the experimental PerformanceLongTaskTiming API, which reports tasks that block the main UI thread for >50 ms. NOTE: Though this event is available as an experimental feature, data for it is not automatically collected. It must be enabled in the browser agent's configuration using a flag on the It's generally recommended to break up and optimize these tasks to prevent delays in processing user input or interactions. Long tasks may affect or closely relate to the |
| The We also report the cumulative layout shift (CLS) score attribute with |
| The We also report the cumulative layout shift (CLS) score attribute with |
| The We also report the cumulative layout shift (CLS) score attribute with |
Compatibility and requirements
Requirements:
- Meets install requirements.
- Reporting of this event requires browser agent version 1153 or higher.
Follow our Browser agent release notes to find out when new metrics are released.
These metrics are supported by the following browser versions. For unsupported browsers, no PageViewTiming
events will be recorded.
Metrics | Supported browser versions |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This event is currently supported by most modern browser versions, except for Safari below 14.1 (desktop) or 14.5 (iOS). Compatibility matrix via MDN documentation. |
| This event is currently supported by all browsers on desktop and mobile. Compatibility matrix via MDN documentation. |
| This event is currently supported by all browsers on desktop and mobile. Compatibility matrix via MDN documentation. |
CumulativeLayoutShift
Cumulative layout shift (CLS) is a metric measuring the stability of the content on a webpage. For a complete description, see web.dev/cls.
How is CLS captured in New Relic
Shifts in page layout as reported by the Layout Instability API are aggregated throughout the life of the page and reported as an attribute on all PageViewTiming
events, representing the CLS value when that event occurred.
Using this model, users can look at their CLS value at different points in the page's life; for example, CLS values up until the first-time users interact with the page or hide the page.
Approximating other CLS sources
Lighthouse captures CLS value only up to the time when a page is loaded, which is useful in a development or lab environment. You can approximate Lighthouse values by looking at the windowLoad
PageViewTiming
event.
CrUX report uses values captured over the lifespan of the page, which is useful to analyze worst-case shifts in a RUM environment. You can approximate CrUX values by looking at the CLS attribute on the windowUnload
PageViewTiming
event. These values will not be exactly the same because of different sample sets and a difference in how values from long-lived web pages are included. The New Relic browser monitoring agent captures CLS when the page unloads, while CrUX collects and updates the metric throughout the lifespan of the page.
How CLS is aggregated
As of July 2021, Google has updated the way CLS values are aggregated. Browser monitoring agent versions v12xx use the method described in Evolving the CLS metric.
Browser monitoring agent v12xx or higher:
Layout shift values are captured in windows. Layout shifts that occurred within 1 second of each other, but no more than 5 seconds between the first and last shift, are part of the same window. A CLS score represents the sum of layout shift values from the window with the highest sum of layout shift values.
Prior to Browser agent v12xx:
A CLS score represents the sum of all layout shifts that occurred up until that point in the page's life.
Query your event data
Here are some sample queries for the event data to help you get started.